Information, connect with, and applicant sex when you look at the U

101 . Newhagen , John E. , “Beyond self-report: Having fun with latency to resolve design the question reacting process toward web-centered public-opinion studies,” on the Sourcebook getting Political Communications Look , eds. Bucy , Erik P. and Lance Holbert , R. ( New york : Routledge , 2011 ).Google College student

102 . Oxley , Douglas R. , Smith , Kevin B. , Alford , John Roentgen. , Hibbing , Matthew V. , Miller , Jennifer L. , Scalora , Mario , Hatemi , Peter K. , and you may Hibbing , John Roentgen. , “Governmental thinking will vary which have emotional faculties,” Research , 321 : 1667 – 1670 .CrossRefGoogle Pupil

103 . Swers , Michele L. , “Is actually feminine expected to vote for ladies points expense than its male acquaintances?” Legislative Degree Quarterly 1998 , 23 : 435 – 448 .CrossRefGoogle Student

104 . Swers , Michele L. how to become a mail order bride , The difference Female Make: The policy Impression of females for the Congress ( Chicago : College or university out-of il Push , 2002 ).Bing College student

105 . Slope , Kim Quaile and you may Hurley , Patricia A beneficial. , “Symbolic speeches on You.S. Senate and their representational implications,” Journal off Government 2002 , 64 : 219 – 231 .CrossRefGoogle College student

108 . Mansbridge , Jane , “Is always to blacks show blacks and you may women depict female? An excellent contingent ‘yes’,” Record out-of Politics 1999 , 61 ( step 3 ): 627 – 657 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

109 . Sanbonmatsu , Kira , “Gender-associated political degree additionally the detailed image of women,” Political Conclusion 2003 , twenty five : 367 – 388 .CrossRefGoogle Pupil

110 . Dolan , Kathleen , “Will there be a great ‘gender attraction effect’ when you look at the Western government? S. Household elections,” Political Research Quarterly 2008 , 61 : 79 – 89 .CrossRefGoogle Pupil

This information has been cited by after the e-books. Which checklist is generated considering analysis provided with Crossref.

Benstead, Lindsay J. Jamal, Amaney An excellent. and you will Crave, Ellen 2015. Could it be Gender, Religiosity otherwise One another? A job Congruity Concept out-of Applicant Electability during the Transitional Tunisia. Views on Politics, Vol. 13, Procedure. 1, p. 74.

Bauer, Nichole Yards. 2015. Just who stereotypes women candidates? Pinpointing private variations in women stereotype dependency. Government, Groups, and you can Identities, Vol. 3, Procedure. 1, p. 94.

Rosenthal , Cindy Simon , “The latest part away from gender in descriptive sign,” Political Lookup Every quarter 1995 , forty eight : 599 – 611

McLaughlin, Bryan Davis, Catasha Coppini, David Kim, Young Mie Knisely, Sandra and you may McLeod, Douglas 2015. Whenever feminine attack. Politics additionally the Life Sciences, Vol. 34, Material. step 1, p. 44.

Pyeatt, Nicholas L. and Yanus, Alixandra B. 2016. Delivering combined signals: the character out-of gender and you may partisanship when you look at the reviews off politicians. Record away from Elections, Public-opinion and you can People, Vol. 26, Thing. cuatro, p. 423.

Koch, Thomas and you may Obermaier, Magdalena 2016. That have Center and you may (No) Mind? Exactly how Users Adversely Infer Forgotten Information about Politicians and how This Affects the latest Research of the Speakermunication Lookup, Vol. 43, Question. seven, p. 972.

Turska-Kawa, Agnieszka and you will Olszanecka-. Stereotypes Determining Perceptions from Women Political figures: The case out of Poland. Government inside Central European countries, Vol. 14, Point. 3, p. eight.

Schneider, Monica C. and Bos, Angela L. 2019. Using Societal Part Principle to the Examination of Gender in Government. Political Psychology, Vol. forty, Material. S1, p. 173.

Park, Sunlight Younger and Baek, Younger Minute 2019. Citizens’ Ambivalence for the Feminine Politicians: As to the reasons Ambivalence Issues getting Gender Equivalence in the a beneficial Democracy. Record of females, Government & Policy, Vol. 40, Situation. dos, p. 309.

Rusidze, Nino 2019. Stereotypes, Character Murder and you may Ladies in Politics. Corvinus Journal regarding Around the world Factors, Vol. cuatro, Issue. step one, p. fifteen.

Aaldering, Loes and Van Der Pas, Daphne Joanna 2020. Governmental Leadership about Mass media: Gender Prejudice into the Chief Stereotypes throughout Venture and Regimen Times. British Journal off Political Technology, Vol. fifty, Topic. step 3, p. 911.

Boer, Noortje 2020. How do Citizens Evaluate Highway?Height Bureaucrats’ Desire and Competence? An excellent Typology and you may Test. Societal Government Opinion, Vol. 80, Matter. cuatro, p. 532.