This can be consistent with a survey (Qandil et al

First: Were there statistically significant differences in the reason why with the delaying age of ong More youthful Jordanians inside the Amman due to geographical supply because of the test of study?

Independent T sample among reasons for delay relationships many years (public and you will monetary) style of Jordanian youngsters when you look at the Amman and you can geographical origin directly sample the research

There are mathematically significant differences in the fresh new social causes of the newest later period of people because of geographical origin where in fact the quantity of benefits (0.000) that is less than (??0.05) together with source of the differences are attributable to new outlying resource, according to the statistical medium In which the analytical medium in their eyes is actually (3.55) that is more than the fresh new populace of your area in which its mathematical medium are (3.46), this is because the fresh outlying somebody still follow the conventional character of family members when it comes to form requirements and you will needs about set of a life partner, They think that social reasons donate to the newest later age of the spouse among young adults into the Jordanian society.

As for the monetary reasons for having new later age of ong Jordanian childhood, there have been variations out-of analytical importance on account of geographical source, where in fact the level of benefits (0.016) was less than (??0.05) therefore the way to obtain the difference was due to new rural provider, according to the analytical medium where mathematical typical in their mind try (4.29) that’s greater than the brand new municipal provider in which its statistical medium is (cuatro.12) and you can because the people of country their economic conditions be hard as compared to people of the brand new urban area by minimal economic issues they routine as well as their requirement for public functions, referring to perhaps not in keeping with studies (Qandil ainsi que al, 2013).

First: Have there been statistically tall variations in this new societal effects of your own later ages of people as a result of the gender of your study sample members?

That we now have zero statistically extreme differences in brand new social effects of your late age guy because of gender, where the level of benefits (0.068) try more than (??0.05), this will be a detection of one’s societal consequences of postponed marriage ages for young adults that happen to be later in-marriage, and that young adults recently relationship decades live-in noticeable societal requirements and you may injury to all of the members of the fresh take to. , 2013).

Second: Are there statistically high differences in new public effects of the later chronilogical age of people due to the age of the study decide to try?

The value of F is actually (six.214) having a level of freedom (step three,381) toward societal effects of your own late chronilogical age of guy within the level of significance of (0.000) that’s lower than 0.05 and from a lot more than i conclude that we now have statistically high variations in the fresh public ramifications off delay guy due to many years.

There are mathematically extreme variations in the fresh public effects off brand new late chronilogical age of people because of the place of quarters where in fact the amount of value (0

008) that’s below (??0.05) together with way to obtain the distinctions is attributed to this new rural inhabitants, depending on the statistical average in which it actually was The fresh new analytical typical for them is actually (4.24) which is more than new society of your urban area where their statistical typical are (4.03), and this is since individuals of the fresh new country, have the effects more than people of one’s city from the advantage of its initial personal connections, and Ponta delgada in Portugal brides you will stick to customs and you may way of life more Urban dwellers, that is similar to the analysis (Qandil, et al., 2013).